Category: Research

I share what I learn as I live in Regency England

‘Old-Fashioned’ Romance?’

July 15, 2024 / Gigi Lynn

What does that mean?

I’m not referring to ‘closed door’ here. Though many readers might see that as old-fashioned. But a romance could be a closed door and still not be old-fashioned.

Do you agree?

I looked up old-fashioned in the Dictionary and got this: according to styles or types no longer current or common; not modern.

Other words (not the negative ones, of which there are many) might be:

quaint
antique
out-of-the-way
picturesque

Or even better:

rare
extraordinary
whimsical

So, are my romance novels old-fashioned?

If you think it’s old-fashioned for the characters in your historical romances to believe and act consistently, for the most part, with the mores of the period setting, then I’m old-fashioned. (A character may break some rules, but I will acknowledge the societal expectation and show some consequences).

Lydia in Pride and Prejudice is an example. She broke the rules, and though she seems blissfully ignorant, her father and two older sisters are definitely not. There is a price they know they will pay.

In my soon-to-be-released novel, Dear Lord Wycliff, Corinna knows it is improper for her to write to a single, unrelated gentleman. And yes, (spoiler) she faces consequences for her impropriety.

Now, most of my main female characters do chafe at restrictions they face because they are women in the Georgian/Regency era. But I have to believe that there were women in that time who felt the same.

And all of my female characters want a man who will love her and be loyal. They expect it, even demand it. This expectation might not be historically accurate, but I want it, expect it, even demand it. I think it still might be considered old-fashioned by many.

What other Old-Fashioned elements do you think should be in a romance novel?

Spend Some Time With Me In the Regency Era

July 25, 2021 / Gigi Lynn

Mad King George III was deemed unfit to rule Britain in 1811, and his son took over as prince regent. Then when George III died in 1820, the regent became King George IV. So technically, the Regency only lasted nine years.

Culturally, however, what we consider the Regency Era spans a longer time period, from about 1795 during the French Revolution (in my mind I see images of that horrifying guillotine) to 1837, when Queen Victoria took the throne. The Regency was more than a change in royalty. It marked the end of the Georgian’s more pious, reserved society. The Prince Regent, being so very different from his father, was kept entirely removed from politics and the military. He channeled his energy into other pursuits, and it showed.

This period saw huge changes in politics, societal structure, and science–this was the beginning of the industrial revolution–but also huge changes in culture, architecture, art, literature, and fashions (the hooped skirts and powdered hair of the Georgian age gave way to the ‘classical’ high waisted dresses of the Regency). In many ways it was a period of cultural refinement, elegance and extravagance—a frivolous and ostentatious age.

And opposite the excesses of the rich was a horrible, crushing poverty and squalor. Gambling, drinking, thievery, and prostitution were rampant in the rookeries of London.

To give you some idea of what was happening, here are some Regency events:

The end of the French revolution (May 5, 1789 – Nov 9, 1799)
The Napoleonic wars (May 18, 1803 – Nov 20, 1815), which provide the background to my Illusions series
The war of 1812 (British impressing American sailors)
First vaccinations against smallpox
Lewis and Clark expedition

Some names you might recognize:

Arthur Wellesley, 1^st Duke of Wellington (defeated Napoleon at Waterloo)
Jane Austen, obviously
Lord Byron, Coleridge, Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley (Percy Bysshe), William Blake–those romantic poets
Mary Shelley and her Frankenstein
Mozart and Beethoven
Mary Wollstonecraft writing about A Vindication of the Rights of Women
William Wilberforce and the other social reformers of the Clapham Sect (I love the movie Amazing Grace about these people).

man sitting beside woman painting — Birmingham Museums Trust@birminghammuseumstrust

Though the cultural/social restrictions for women were still very real, during the regency women began to challenge old preconceptions and conventional thinking. It’s part of what makes Jane Austen so current even today. Change was everywhere. Exciting things happen in those in-between times. It sparks my imagination and gives me some latitude when creating my brave, strong female characters.

Join me for a little time in the Regency Era! I believe you will love it.

What ever happened to “the morning call?”

June 6, 2021 / Gigi Lynn

I type this as I sit on my couch, in my pajamas and with my hair scooped up in a messy bunch (I can’t even call it a bun–that would suggest a style). I am doing one more run through my novella, Smoke and Shadows, before I send it to the editor and load it to Amazon (for free) sometime in the next week or so. I’m comfortable and I’m being productive. This is good, right?

But I’m a little nervous that someone will come to the door. I’m deep in my regency world–Who’s starting those fires, and when did Philip become so attractive?–and then suddenly the thought sneaks in, “I really should go get dressed and do my hair. Or maybe I should even put some makeup on. I just know someone is going to come to the door.” You may think that’s not such a big deal, but this is the beginning of a very serious, slippery slope. I may notice as I do my hair that I should start some laundry, and why don’t I just organize my closet while I’m here? And why do I still have this skirt? These thoughts are not conducive to writing.

And then I write in my story about the morning call my character receives. Regency families scheduled one or two days a week where they were “home to callers.” From say 11:00 in the morning until maybe two or three, a lady (or gentleman/family) accepted visits from her neighbors and those who wanted to make or further her acquaintance. This assumed that she wanted to visit with the person who sent in their card (name, direction, read this as address). If she didn’t feel comfortable making or furthering an acquaintance, her servant could tell the “caller” that she was not “at home to visitors.”

birmingham-museums-trust-TocYv7GqiDs-unsplash.jpg

When a caller was invited in, the rules of the visit were set. It should be at least fifteen minutes, but no longer than thirty. There were accepted topics of conversation, and everyone knew what they were–avoid talking about things that are too personal, no gossiping. and be pleasant.

Of course it wouldn’t work for me. First–no servant. Second–I am not so organized that I would feel comfortable saying, as an example, every Wednesday from 11-2, I will be home to callers. What if things are really going well with the writing? I don’t want to see people then. What if one of my children or a neighbor calls and I need to be with them? What if I just don’t want to change out of my pajamas? (see scary picture above). Third–I’m not a formal person. I like to visit. (I tend to prefer to visit with one or a few, rather than attend a party of many people), but when I’m getting to know someone or spending time with a friend, I can’t imagine limiting a visit to half an hour. How can you really get to know someone or continue to build a relationship in half-hour increments? (And sometimes I get personal).

No.I’ll just have to discipline myself to sit here on this couch in my pajamas, bad hair, no make-up state and write/edit. And hope everyone is “calling” on someone else this afternoon.